Who has actually been good
Team
Toronto Maple Leafs

Buffalo Sabres
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montréal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
Season2022-23
Every Toronto Maple Leafs player rated out of 100 against NHL players at his own position. Wins above replacement sits beside each rating, and the bars show where the number comes from — sort by any situation to see who is driving the power play or holding up defensively.
90+Elite75+Top of the roster60+Middle of the roster40+Everyday NHLer20+Depth0+Below replacement
Focus
Roster total31.6wins above replacement across 47 players
| # | Player | Rating | GP | TOI | WAR split | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ilya SamsonovG | 94 | 42 | 2476 | +3.18 | |
| 2 | Auston MatthewsC | 98 | 74 | 1501 | +3.11 | |
| 3 | Mitch MarnerR | 96 | 80 | 1702 | +2.52 | |
| 4 | William NylanderR | 93 | 82 | 1521 | +2.22 | |
| 5 | Michael BuntingL | 87 | 82 | 1296 | +1.70 | |
| 6 | Erik GustafssonD | 87 | 70 | 1384 | +1.61 | |
| 7 | Pierre EngvallL | 82 | 76 | 1036 | +1.43 | |
| 8 | Rasmus SandinD | 83 | 71 | 1372 | +1.37 | |
| 9 | TJ BrodieD | 82 | 58 | 1231 | +1.36 | |
| 10 | Calle JarnkrokC | 75 | 73 | 1050 | +1.20 | |
| 11 | Ryan O'ReillyC | 73 | 53 | 951 | +1.15 | |
| 12 | Mark GiordanoD | 74 | 78 | 1478 | +1.09 | |
| 13 | Alexander KerfootC | 70 | 82 | 1200 | +1.08 | |
| 14 | Morgan RiellyD | 70 | 65 | 1411 | +0.99 | |
| 15 | John TavaresC | 66 | 80 | 1413 | +0.97 | |
| 16 | Timothy LiljegrenD | 68 | 67 | 1200 | +0.97 | |
| 17 | Justin HollD | 67 | 80 | 1619 | +0.93 | |
| 18 | Jake McCabeD | 63 | 76 | 1480 | +0.80 | |
| 19 | Denis MalginC | 54 | 65 | 710 | +0.75 | |
| 20 | Noel AcciariC | 48 | 77 | 1102 | +0.65 | |
| 21 | Joseph WollG | 63 | 7 | 421 | +0.60 | |
| 22 | David KampfC | 39 | 82 | 1255 | +0.41 | |
| 23 | Erik KallgrenG | 54 | 10 | 562 | +0.37 | |
| 24 | Joey AndersonR | 30 | 38 | 445 | +0.28 | |
| 25 | Sam LaffertyC | 29 | 70 | 1023 | +0.28 | |
| 26 | Conor TimminsD | 35 | 27 | 407 | +0.25 | |
| 27 | Nicolas Aube-KubelR | 27 | 53 | 602 | +0.24 | |
| 28 | Pontus HolmbergR | 21 | 37 | 386 | +0.19 | |
| 29 | Zachary Aston-ReeseL | 20 | 77 | 841 | +0.18 | |
| 30 | Dryden HuntL | 11 | 37 | 299 | +0.08 | |
| 31 | Nicholas RobertsonL | — | 15 | 163 | +0.03 | |
| 32 | Luke SchennD | 10 | 70 | 1145 | +0.02 | |
| 33 | Radim ZohornaL | — | 10 | 86 | +0.01 | |
| 34 | Victor MeteD | — | 11 | 144 | +0.01 | |
| 35 | Mac HollowellD | — | 6 | 78 | +0.00 | |
| 36 | Nick AbruzzeseC | — | 2 | 18 | +0.00 | |
| 37 | Alex SteevesC | — | 3 | 24 | +0.00 | |
| 38 | Matthew KniesL | — | 3 | 39 | +0.00 | |
| 39 | Jett AlexanderG | — | 1 | 1 | +0.00 | |
| 40 | Semyon Der-ArguchintsevC | — | 1 | 7 | +0.00 | |
| 41 | Filip KralD | — | 2 | 20 | -0.00 | |
| 42 | Bobby McMannC | — | 10 | 106 | -0.00 | |
| 43 | Kyle CliffordL | — | 2 | 16 | -0.00 | |
| 44 | Jake MuzzinD | — | 4 | 67 | -0.00 | |
| 45 | Jordie BennD | — | 12 | 190 | -0.01 | |
| 46 | Wayne SimmondsR | — | 18 | 134 | -0.03 | |
| 47 | Matt MurrayG | 25 | 26 | 1473 | -0.34 |
Situation split
Even-strength offenseEven-strength defensePower-play offensePower-play defenseShorthanded offenseShorthanded defensePenalties (drawn minus taken)Finishing (goals above expected)
A rating is a player's percentile among NHL players at his position — defensemen are ranked against defensemen, not against forwards, so a 70 means different things for a winger and a blueliner in raw wins. It is measured from wins above replacement, which converts on-ice and individual contributions into wins beyond what a freely available replacement would provide. Bars are drawn on a shared scale, so they are comparable down the column. How this is calculated